|
Библиотека
|
ваш профиль |
Статья опубликована с лицензией Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) – Лицензия «С указанием авторства – Некоммерческая».|
Философия и культура
Правильная ссылка на статью:
Зима В.Н.
On the Way from Metaphysics of Time to Atemporal Metaphysics: Exploring Some Difficulties of Ontology
// Философия и культура.
2013. № 11.
С. 1543-1547.
URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=63547
Зима В.Н. On the Way from Metaphysics of Time to Atemporal Metaphysics: Exploring Some Difficulties of OntologyАннотация: The explication and the analysis of some basic difficulties which realization of the project of «atemporal physics and metaphysics» in modern philosophy and a science faces is undertaken. It is shown, that key idea of the given project is attempt of representation of the objective reality (or so-called «the ultimate reality») as reality that is timeless at its fundamental level. The question on the ontological status of concepts of "time" and «the ultimate reality» from the point of view of the ontology of sciences is analyzed. Conclusion that concepts of "time", from one hand, and «the ultimate reality», from other hand, when latter one is considered as a synonym of the objective reality, are ontologically incompatible, is supposed. Ontological resources of the interdisciplinary approach to the problem of time in a context of the question of "the ultimate reality» are explored. Some ontological criteria for the objectification of time in the ontology of science and metaphysics are formulated. Heuristic potential of the thesis of "Realism", as the fundamental metaphysical premise of a science, for the decision of a question on the nature of «the ultimate reality» and its temporal features is shown. Some difficulties connected with terminological aspect of a problem of elaborating of «atemporal metaphysics are analyzed. Ключевые слова: ultimate reality, eternity, time, philosophy of science, time: interdisciplinary researches, metaphysics of time, timelessness, atemporal metaphysics, ontology of science, objective realityAbstract: The explication and the analysis of some basic difficulties which realization of the project of «atemporal physics and metaphysics» in modern philosophy and a science faces is undertaken. It is shown, that key idea of the given project is attempt of representation of the objective reality (or so-called «the ultimate reality») as reality that is timeless at its fundamental level. The question on the ontological status of concepts of \"time\" and «the ultimate reality» from the point of view of the ontology of sciences is analyzed. Conclusion that concepts of \"time\", from one hand, and «the ultimate reality», from other hand, when latter one is considered as a synonym of the objective reality, are ontologically incompatible, is supposed. Ontological resources of the interdisciplinary approach to the problem of time in a context of the question of \"the ultimate reality» are explored. Some ontological criteria for the objectification of time in the ontology of science and metaphysics are formulated. Heuristic potential of the thesis of \"Realism\", as the fundamental metaphysical premise of a science, for the decision of a question on the nature of «the ultimate reality» and its temporal features is shown. Some difficulties connected with terminological aspect of a problem of elaborating of «atemporal metaphysics are analyzed. Keywords: ultimate reality, eternity, time, philosophy of science, time: interdisciplinary researches, metaphysics of time, timelessness, atemporal metaphysics, ontology of science, objective reality.
Эта статья может быть бесплатно загружена в формате PDF для чтения. Обращаем ваше внимание на необходимость соблюдения авторских прав,
указания библиографической ссылки на статью при цитировании.
Скачать статью Библиография
1. Stenger V.J. Timeless Reality: Symmetry, Simplicity, and Multiple Universes. Prometheus Books. N.Y., 2000. – 396 p.
2. Sorabji R. Time, creation and the continuum: theories in antique and the early middle ages. Ithaca (N.Y.), 1983. – 473 p.
3. Maximi confessoris. Ambiguorum Liber // PG. 91. Col. 1031-1418.
4. Price H. Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point. – N.Y., 1996. – xiii+306 p.
5. Healey R. Can Physics Coherently Deny the Reality of Time? // Time, Reality &Experience /edited by Craig Callender. – N.Y., 2002. – P. 293-316.
6. Einstein A. Maxwell’s Influence on the Development of the Conception of Physical Reality / James Clerk Maxwell: A Commemoration Volume. Cambridge University Press, 1931. – P. 66-73.
7. Craig W.L. Time and eternity: Exploring God’s Relationship to Time. – Crossway, Wheaton, Illinois, 2001. – 272 p.
References
1. Stenger V.J. Timeless Reality: Symmetry, Simplicity, and Multiple Universes. Prometheus Books. N.Y., 2000. – 396 p.
2. Sorabji R. Time, creation and the continuum: theories in antique and the early middle ages. Ithaca (N.Y.), 1983. – 473 p.
3. Maximi confessoris. Ambiguorum Liber // PG. 91. Col. 1031-1418.
4. Price H. Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point. – N.Y., 1996. – xiii+306 p.
5. Healey R. Can Physics Coherently Deny the Reality of Time? // Time, Reality &Experience /edited by Craig Callender. – N.Y., 2002. – P. 293-316.
6. Einstein A. Maxwell’s Influence on the Development of the Conception of Physical Reality / James Clerk Maxwell: A Commemoration Volume. Cambridge University Press, 1931. – P. 66-73.
7. Craig W.L. Time and eternity: Exploring God’s Relationship to Time. – Crossway, Wheaton, Illinois, 2001. – 272 p.
|
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Рус
