Правильная ссылка на статью:
Ди Грегорио А..
Vetting in post-authoritarian societies: a proposal of classification from the point of view of comparative law
// Конфликтология / nota bene. – 2014. – № 1.
– С. 7-27.
Читать статью
Аннотация: The aim of this article is to describe the so-called ‘vetting’, within the framework of transitional justice policies. In order to do that, it is first necessary to answer a series of preliminary questions.
In general we talk about post-authoritarian justice (term which I do prefer to others, like transitional justice ), dealing with the past, coping with the past, but also ‘militant democracy’ . The latter is a concept not usually employed in writing on these matters but, as I will explain, still very pertinent to the issue. In fact, I consider necessary to highlight the relation between vetting and protection of democratic legal order .
Vetting is only one of the transitional justice measures, aimed at removing from public life representatives of the leadership and management of the old authoritarian regime (political élite, administrators) .
The definition and the meaning are not the same in other languages.
The methodological basis of the research is a systematic, structural-functional, comparative approaches, methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, observation. Main results of this article: 1. Linguistic and definition problems: vetting in the framework of post-authoritarian justice; 2. Transition to democracy: a record; 3. A brief history of vetting; 4. Circulation of models and comparison between countries and areas; 5. The phenomenon of lustration in post-communist Europe; 6. Conclusion: vetting as a protection of democracy
Ключевые слова: Конфликтология, политика, право, post-authoritarian societies, политическая стабильность, политический режим, государство, интересы, ценности, безопасность
Библиография:
Di Gregorio, La transizione in Cecoslovacchia: principali profili di diritto costituzionale, in S. Gambino (a cura di), Costituzionalismo europeo e transizioni democratiche, Milano, 2003.
D. Kosař, Lustration and Lapse of Time: ‘Dealing with the Past’ in the Czech Republic, in European Constitutional Law Review, vol. 4, issue 3, 2008.
J. Příbáň et al. (eds.), Systems of Justice in Transition: Central European Experiences since 1989, Aldershot, Ashgate, 2003;
V. Cepl, Ritual Sacrifices: Lustration in CSFR, in East European Constitutional Review, Vol. 1, no. 1, 1992;
J. Šiklová, Lustration or the Czech Way of Screening, in M. Krygier, A. W. Czarnota, The Rule of Law after Communism: Problems and Prospects in East-Central Europe, Aldershot, Ashgate, 1999;
C. Offe, Varieties of Transition: the East European and East German Experience, Cambridge, Polity, 1996.
www.ustrcr.cz.
A. Buyse, M. Hamilton (eds.), Transitional Jurisprudence and the ECHR. Justice, Polit